Differentiation And Intergration In Determinants
When the entries of a determinant are functions of a variable, we can differentiate or integrate the determinant using row-wise or column-wise rules. For a JEE Mathematics problem, differentiating a determinant with respect to gives a sum of determinants - one for each row (or column) differentiated. Integrating a determinant is straightforward only when the variable appears in exactly one row (or column); otherwise, expand first and integrate the resulting polynomial or trigonometric expression.
- Column-wise differentiation: if , then
- Row-wise differentiation: if , then
- Single-row differentiation (for ): ,
- Integration when only one row depends on : if with constants, then
1. Differentiation of a Determinant
When the entries of a determinant are differentiable functions of , we differentiate the determinant one row (or one column) at a time.
Two-by-two Case
Let . Then:
where a dash denotes derivative with respect to . Each term differentiates one row, keeping the others fixed.
Three-by-three Case (Column-wise)
If we write , then:
Three-by-three Case (Row-wise)
Similarly, if , then:
Only the first row of depends on . Row-wise differentiation gives:
(The other two terms vanish because and are constant with respect to .)
Now evaluate at :
- : rows and become identical, so the determinant vanishes.
- : rows and become identical, so the determinant vanishes.
Since and , the polynomial has as a double root, i.e. where is a polynomial of degree .
Also, is a quadratic with repeated root , so for some constant . Therefore is divisible by .
Every row depends on . Row-wise differentiation:
Now substitute . Given that for all :
- In the first term, and both become - identical rows, so the first determinant is .
- In the second term, and are identical, so it is .
- In the third term, and are identical, so it is .
Therefore .
2. Determinants Involving Integration
Integration of a determinant is straightforward when only one row (or column) depends on the integration variable.
Since multiple rows depend on , we must expand first. Operate :
New becomes .
Expanding along (only the third entry is nonzero):
Simplify : writing everything with and ,
After algebraic simplification (multiply out and factor ):
Now integrate from to :
Using standard results and :
Split using Property 5:
Apply and to both determinants:
Factor from column 1 and from column 3 in both determinants:
Expanding each along (only the middle entry contributes, with sign ):
The determinant is the standard circulant, which factors as:
So either or .
Case A: . Taking real and imaginary parts:
Grouping: , so the cosine equation becomes . Similarly the sine equation becomes .
These two must hold simultaneously. requires (else is undefined mod ), and contradicts . So Case A has no solution.
Case B: , i.e. . This forces , giving and , i.e. , .
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Differentiating every entry at once. The rule is one row (or column) at a time - you get a sum of determinants, not a single determinant with every entry differentiated.
- Integrating a determinant with multiple -dependent rows term-by-term. This is wrong. If more than one row (or column) contains , you must expand the determinant first and integrate the resulting expression.
- Missing zero terms in row-wise differentiation. If only depends on , only one of the three row-derivative determinants is nonzero; the other two vanish because differentiating a constant row gives a zero row.
- Confusing row-wise and column-wise differentiation. Both give the same , but use whichever produces fewer nonzero terms - check which direction has fewer -dependent entries.
- Applying the product rule instead of the determinant differentiation rule. The determinant is not a product of its entries; use the row/column rule from this concept, not the calculus product rule.
- Ignoring the range in definite integration. When integrating a single-row-dependent determinant, the limits go on the integrals inside the row - the constant entries are not touched by the limits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can I not just differentiate every entry of a determinant at once?
Because a determinant is a multilinear function of its rows (or columns), not a linear function of its entries. Applying the chain rule row by row gives a sum of determinants; treating it as a single product and differentiating each entry independently would miss cross-terms and give the wrong answer.
When do I use row-wise versus column-wise differentiation?
They give the same . Use whichever leads to fewer terms - if only one column depends on , use column-wise (only one term survives). If only one row depends on , use row-wise. For fully -dependent determinants, both give three nonzero terms.
Can I integrate a determinant term-by-term across all rows?
No. The integration rule works only when exactly one row (or one column) depends on the integration variable and the other rows (columns) are constants. If two or more rows contain the variable, expand the determinant first, then integrate the resulting scalar expression.
What happens to constant rows when I differentiate the determinant?
A row of constants contributes a zero row upon differentiation, and any determinant with a zero row is (Property 7). So constant rows drop out of the row-wise differentiation sum, leaving only terms where the differentiated row is -dependent.
Is ?
No, this is false. The correct rule is Jacobi's formula: , which expands to the row-wise or column-wise sum of determinants shown in this concept.
How does the factor theorem interact with differentiation of determinants?
If a determinant vanishes at and its derivative also vanishes at , then divides . This is how we prove that certain determinants are divisible by quadratic factors like .
Are there JEE Advanced problems that use both differentiation and properties of determinants?
Yes - many. A common pattern: given a determinant with -dependent entries, use row/column operations to simplify, then differentiate and evaluate at a specific . Recognising when rows become identical after substitution is the key skill.
Can I differentiate implicit determinant equations like ?
Yes. Differentiate both sides using the row-wise rule; the derivative of is , giving you a determinantal equation that the -values satisfying must also satisfy. This is useful for finding multiple roots.
Previous year questions on Differentiation And Intergration In Determinants
2 questions from past papers, each with a step-by-step solution.
Ready to master Determinants?
Take a full mock test, practice concept-by-concept, and get an AI-powered rank prediction — all on Fundamenthol.