Introduction To Limits
INTRODUCTION
Consider the function. Clearly is not defined at x = 1. At x = 1, , which is meaningless.
From the above table it is clear that as x approaches to 1 i.e. x 1 from the left hand side (means x approaches 1 from the values less than 1) approaches to 2 i.e. The number 2 is called the left limit of and in symbol we shall write .
Again let us study the behaviour of f(x) where x approaches towards 1 from the right-hand side.
It is clear from the table that as x approaches to 2 i.e. x 2, from the right-hand side (means x approaches 1 from the values greater than 1) f(x) approaches to 2 i.e. Here 2 is called the right-hand limit of f(x) and in symbol we will write
Thus we see that f(x) is not defined at x = 1 but its left-hand limit and right-hand limit as x ® 1 exist and are equal. When are equal we say exist and is equal to 2.
Meaning of (x a)
Let x be a variable and 'a' be a constant. x assumes value nearer and nearer to 'a', then we say 'x tends to a' and write 'x a' and it doesn't mean x = a.
CONCEPT OF LIMIT
Let y = f(x) be a given function defined in the neighbourhood of x = a, but not necessarily at the point x = a. The limiting behaviour of the function in the neighbour of x = a is called the limit of the function when x approaches a. Mathematically we write this as .
would simply mean that when we approach the point x = a from the value which are just greater than or just smaller than x = a, f (x) would have a tendency to move closer to the value .
RIGHT AND LEFT HAND LIMIT
Right-hand limit means tendency of function when we approach x = a from the value which just greater than 'a' and we write .
Working rule to evaluate
Put x = a + h in f(x) to get
Take the limit as h 0
Left-hand limit means tendency of function when we approach x = a from the values which are just less than 'a' and we write .
Working rule to evaluate
Put x = a – h in f(x) to get
Take the limit as h 0
For example:
Thus for the existence of the limit of f(x) at x=a, it is necessary and sufficient that = , if these are finite or and both should be either + or -.
REASON FOR NON-EXISTENCE OF THE LIMIT
Following are the reasons when will not exist.
Reason 1: when left and right tendencies of f(x) are not same in the neighbourhood of
For example (when [.] denotes the greatest integer function)
It is clear from the figure that left tendency of [x] at x = 2 is 1 while the right tendency of [x] at x = 2 is 2. This will not exist.
Reason 2: If f(x) is not defined in the neighbourhood of x = a. For example Here f(x) is well defined at x = 0
But in the left neighbourhood of 0, means , when
, similarly for right tendency , in this case also in the right neighbourhood of x=0, cosx<1. Hence sec-1(cosx) is not defined.
Reason 3: When f(x) doesn't have a unique tendency. For example we have that –1 sinx 1, that means for all non-zero values of x, sin 1/x would assume finite values. But when x becomes very near to zero sin 1/x would erratically oscillate between –1 and + 1. It implies that sin 1/x wouldn't have unique tendency for very small value of x. Thus will not exist.
BASIC THEOREMS ON LIMITS
Let f(x) = and g(x) = , where and are finite, then the following theorems on limits can be used to evaluate the limits
(i) (c1 f(x) c2 g(x)) = c1 , where c1and c2 are given constants.
(ii) f(x). g(x) = f (x). g (x) =
(iii)
(iv) f (g(x)) = f (g(x)) = f, if and only if f(x) is continuous at x = .
For example (where [.]denotes the greatest integer function)Here [x] is not continuous at x = 1. Also =0 and =1.
(v) If f(x) g(x) x R, then f(x) g(x).
Note: We have to be very careful while using these theorems. For example if we try to apply the theorems on =1 we get = sin x.
. 1/x, which does not exist.
Which is an absurd result, because in this case the given limit can not be written as the product of two limits as 1/x does not exist.
Ready to master Limits, Continuity And Differentiability?
Take a full mock test, practice concept-by-concept, and get an AI-powered rank prediction — all on Fundamenthol.